Which term refers to acts that obstruct the judicial process?

The correct term that refers to acts that obstruct the judicial process is contempt of court. This legal concept encompasses any behavior that shows disrespect or disregard for the court's authority, including failing to comply with court orders, disrupting court proceedings, or disobeying the rules set forth by the court. Such actions can undermine the integrity of the judicial system, hinder the fair administration of justice, and result in penalties for the offending party.

Contempt of court can be classified into different types—such as civil contempt, which seeks to compel someone to comply with a court order, and criminal contempt, which punishes an individual for actions that disrespect the court. The primary goal of imposing penalties for contempt is to uphold the court's authority and ensure that legal proceedings can be carried out without obstruction.

While contumacy refers to a specific form of contempt involving a refusal to obey a court order, contempt of court is the broader term that encompasses all types of actions that obstruct judicial processes. Counterclaim relates to a defendant's claim against a plaintiff and does not address obstruction, while corroboration pertains to supporting evidence and is also unrelated to judicial obstruction.